Whats webhard

what's webhard?

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only must be in a folder.

You will need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. p2p 추천 However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.